Strengths-based pedagogy is an educational approach that focuses on identifying and cultivating the inherent strengths, talents, and potential of children. This paper explores the role of strengths-based teaching strategies in fostering personalized learning and development, highlighting how these approaches promote student engagement, self-esteem, and resilience. Drawing on a combination of literature review, case studies, and educator perspectives, the research examines the benefits of strengths-based practices, such as differentiated instruction, positive reinforcement, and individualized support, in meeting the diverse needs of learners. The study also discusses the challenges and barriers to implementing such approaches in diverse educational settings and provides practical recommendations for teachers, schools, and policymakers. Ultimately, the paper advocates for the adoption of strengths-based pedagogy as a means to empower children, enhance their learning experiences, and cultivate their long-term success.

Strengths-based pedagogy, Personalized learning, Educational development

Babbie, E. (2014). The basics of social research (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Centage Learning.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 82, 191–215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & Minhas, G. (2011). A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 106–118.

Brownlee, K., Rawana, E. P., & MacArthur, J. (2012). Implementation of a strengths-based approach to teaching in an elementary School. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1–12.

Butz, A.R., & Usher, E.L. (2015). Salient sources of early adolescents' self- efficacy in two domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 42, 49-61.

Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J.

Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–335). New York, NY: Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research in education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.