Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-12-28

IMPROVING LEXICAL COMPETENCE OF A+ LEVEL LEARNERS

Karimova Muattar Fayzullayevna , Basic doctoral student in Tashkent, State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The study examined the whether different instructional strategies impact on the development of lexical competence in A+ level learners. An evaluation of the effectiveness of identified instructional strategies intertwined with explicit vocabulary teaching in improving lexical competence have been addressed. The analysis of cognitive and motivational factors in lexical competence development have been examined.

Materials and Methods: Vocabulary Learning Strategies Inventory (VLSI) was administered. Performance was compared using a pre- and post-test in the study. Participants were informed about the study's objectives and data anonymization was done with an eye on ethical considerations.

Results: Results showed consistency and stability when the investigation looked at participants' vocabulary ratings. There was a strong relationship between the results of vocabulary learning tactics and improvements in pre- and post-test scores, according to the study. The growth of lexical competence was validated by the Peason Product Moment Correlation. Subjects' reported vocabulary acquisition tactics were positively correlated with their post-test scores, suggesting that their strategies were effective.

Discussion: In order to increase post-scores, the study found that A+ level learners should use vocabulary building tactics such as context-based learning, mnemonics, word association, and repetition. Memory, retention, word retrieval, and context-based learning are all ways that can improve one's vocabulary, but prior studies failed to find a strong correlation between the two. More advanced vocabulary acquisition models and investigations into possible reasons should guide future research.

Conclusion: Using mnemonics, word associations, context-based learning, and repetition, the study examines how A-level learners might increase their lexical competence. It emphasizes the importance of motivation and cognition in learning new words, with the most fruitful strategies being word association and context-based learning, which lead to excellent results on final exams.

Keywords

a-level learners, lexical competence, experimental design

References

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Delgadova, E. (2015). Reading literacy as one of the significant academic competencies for university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.145

Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: the complete view of reading (CVRi). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518772904

Gumede, T., & Boakye, N. (2020). Investigating the reading comprehension ability of Grade 9 (Form 2) learners at Bulawayo Central District high schools in Zimbabwe. Per Linguam, 36(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.5785/36-1-938

Kim, S. G., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2019). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), 638–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13204

Laufer, B. (2018). The influence of lexical competence on academic writing: Exploring the connections between vocabulary knowledge and writing ability. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.04.002

Nation, I. S. P. (2018). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272

Piper, B., Schroeder, L., & Trudell, B. (2016). Oral reading fluency and comprehension in Kenya: reading acquisition in a multilingual environment. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12052

Pretorius, E. J., & Spaull, N. (2016). Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. International Journal: Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1449–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9645-9

Snow, C. E., & Mathews, T. J. (2016). Reading and learning in the early grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2016.0012

Wang, Z., Sabatin, J., O'Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. (2018). Decoding and reading comprehension: a test of the decoding threshold hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000032

Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2018). The impact of vocabulary learning strategies on vocabulary size and depth of knowledge: a longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817698704

Wills, G., Ardington, C., Pretorius, E. J., & Sebaeng, L. (2022). Benchmarking early grade reading skills: English first additional language, summary report. Khulisa Management Services.

Zhao, X., & Li, Q. (2018). Cognitive factors influencing vocabulary acquisition: Insights for advanced language learners. Language Learning, 68(4), 1042–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12288

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Karimova Muattar Fayzullayevna. (2024). IMPROVING LEXICAL COMPETENCE OF A+ LEVEL LEARNERS. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 5(12), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-12-28