Early Numeracy Interventions, Teacher Beliefs, And Inclusive Pedagogical Practices In Addressing Mathematical Learning Difficulties: A Comprehensive Research Synthesis
Keywords:
Early numeracy, mathematical learning difficulties, inclusive educationAbstract
Mathematical learning difficulties constitute one of the most persistent and complex challenges in contemporary education systems, particularly during the early years of schooling when foundational numeracy skills are established. This article presents a comprehensive, theoretically grounded research synthesis examining early numeracy development, intervention strategies, teacher beliefs, instructional competence, and inclusive educational practices for learners experiencing mathematical learning difficulties. Drawing exclusively on a robust corpus of international peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and methodological frameworks, the study integrates quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods evidence to explore how early identification, targeted instructional interventions, and adaptive teaching practices influence mathematical outcomes. Special emphasis is placed on counting-focused interventions, number sense development, formative assessment, differentiated instruction, and teacher knowledge for teaching mathematics. The analysis further interrogates the socio-cultural, institutional, and belief-based dimensions shaping instructional decision-making and learner inclusion, highlighting tensions between standardized curricula and individualized educational needs. Methodologically, the article adopts a systematic narrative synthesis combined with thematic analytical techniques to generate nuanced insights into intervention effectiveness and implementation fidelity. Findings reveal that early numeracy competencies serve as powerful predictors of later mathematical achievement, while well-designed, responsive interventions significantly mitigate long-term learning difficulties. However, results also expose persistent gaps related to teacher preparedness, belief systems, and structural conditions that constrain inclusive practice. The discussion situates these findings within contemporary theoretical debates on learning difficulties, inclusive education, and assessment for learning, offering critical reflections on limitations and future research trajectories. The article concludes by advocating for integrated, evidence-informed approaches that align pedagogical expertise, early intervention, and inclusive educational policy to enhance equity and mathematical learning outcomes for all students.
Downloads
References
Akther, S. S., Powell, S. R., & Lariviere, D. O. (2025). Counting-focused intervention effects for students with mathematics difficulty: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 40(3), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982251321538
Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.003
Aunio, P., Korhonen, J., Ragpot, L., Törmänen, M., & Henning, E. (2021). An early numeracy intervention for first-graders at risk for mathematical learning difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.002
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Beswick, K. (2008). Influencing teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics for numeracy to students with mathematics learning difficulties. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 3–20.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Buli-Holmberg, J., Nilsen, S., & Skogen, K. (2015). Kultur for tilpasset opplæring. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Chin, K. E., & Fu, S. H. (2021). Exploring the implementation of an intervention for a pupil with mathematical learning difficulties: A case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.14473.531-546
Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040801
Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301
Gifford, S., & Rockliffe, F. (2012). Mathematics difficulties: does one approach fit all? Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.657436
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
Hamukwaya, S. T., & Haser, Ç. (2021). “It does not mean that they cannot do mathematics”: Beliefs about mathematics learning difficulties. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9569
Hansen, J. H., Carrington, S., Jensen, C. R., Molbæk, M., & Secher Schmidt, M. C. (2020). The collaborative practice of inclusion and exclusion. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1730112
Hanssen, N. B., Valle, A. M., Lagestad, P., Tverbakk, M. L., & Marôco, J. (2025). A survey of teachers’ self-reported competence regarding mathematical learning disabilities in Norwegian dyslexia-friendly schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2514139
Herner-Patnode, L., & Lee, H.-J. (2021). Differentiated instruction to teach mathematics: Through the lens of responsive teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 6–25.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x
Klette, K. (2007). Bruk av arbeidsplaner i skolen – et hovedverktøy for å realisere tilpasset opplæring? Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 91, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2987-2007-04-08
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). Overordnet del – Undervisning og tilpasset opplæring. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/3.-prinsipper-for-skolens-praksis/3.2-undervisning-og-tilpasset-opplaring
Lunde, O. (2010). Hvorfor tall går i ball: Matematikkvansker i et spesialpedagogisk fokus. Info Vest Forlag.
Mahoney, J., & Hall, C. (2017). Using technology to differentiate and accommodate students with disabilities. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017751517
Mazzocco, M. M., & Myers, G. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 218–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0011-7
Molbaek, M. (2018). Inclusive teaching strategies – Dimensions and agendas. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(10), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1414578
Nelson, G., Crawford, A., Hunt, J., Park, S., Leckie, E., Duarte, A., Brafford, T., Ramos-Duke, M., & Zarate, K. (2022). A systematic review of research syntheses on students with mathematics learning disabilities and difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12272
Opplæringslova. (2023). Lov om grunnskoleopplæringa og den vidaregåande opplæringa. https://lovdata.no/lov/2023-06-09-30
Ostad, S. A. (2010). Matematikkvansker: En forskningsbasert tilnærming. Fagbokforlaget.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Sofia Lindqvist

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
