Developing Primary School Pupils’ Grammatical Skills Through Electronic Exercises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-07-02-14Keywords:
Primary education, grammatical competence, electronic exercisesAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital learning environments has intensified interest in how electronic exercises can support the development of grammatical skills in primary school pupils. Grammar at the early stage is not simply a set of rules to memorize; it is a resource for meaning-making that pupils gradually learn to notice, manipulate, and apply in speech and writing. This article examines how electronic exercises—interactive tasks delivered through learning platforms, mobile applications, and classroom technologies—can strengthen grammatical competence when aligned with age-related cognitive characteristics and evidence-based learning principles. Using an integrative analysis of foundational research on grammar pedagogy, multimedia learning, formative feedback, and practice effects, the paper proposes a coherent methodological approach for designing and integrating electronic grammar exercises into primary instruction. The analysis highlights that effective e-exercises combine meaningful contexts with focused attention to form, manage cognitive load through well-designed multimodal supports, provide timely formative feedback, and distribute practice over time to support retention and transfer. The paper also discusses teacher mediation, equity, and assessment considerations, arguing that electronic exercises are most effective when they serve as structured practice and feedback systems within a broader communicative and text-based curriculum rather than as isolated drill.
Downloads
References
Canale, M.; Swain, M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing // Applied Linguistics. 1980. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 1–47.
Cameron, L. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 272 p.
Cepeda, N. J.; Pashler, H.; Vul, E.; Wixted, J. T.; Rohrer, D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis // Psychological Bulletin. 2006. Vol. 132, No. 3. P. 354–380.
Chapelle, C. A. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 236 p.
Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior // Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11, No. 4. P. 227–268.
Ellis, R. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective // TESOL Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 40, No. 1. P. 83–107.
Hattie, J.; Timperley, H. The power of feedback // Review of Educational Research. 2007. Vol. 77, No. 1. P. 81–112.
Karpicke, J. D.; Roediger, H. L. The critical importance of retrieval for learning // Science. 2008. Vol. 319, No. 5865. P. 966–968.
Larsen-Freeman, D. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Boston: Heinle, 2003. 160 p.
Levy, M. Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. 298 p.
Mayer, R. E. Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 304 p.
Norris, J. M.; Ortega, L. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis // Language Learning. 2000. Vol. 50, No. 3. P. 417–528.
Paas, F.; Renkl, A.; Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments // Educational Psychologist. 2003. Vol. 38, No. 1. P. 1–4.
Pinter, A. Teaching Young Language Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 192 p.
Black, P.; Wiliam, D. Assessment and classroom learning // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 1998. Vol. 5, No. 1. P. 7–74.
Shute, V. J. Focus on formative feedback // Review of Educational Research. 2008. Vol. 78, No. 1. P. 153–189.
Spada, N.; Tomita, Y. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis // Language Learning. 2010. Vol. 60, No. 2. P. 263–308.
VanLehn, K. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems // Educational Psychologist. 2011. Vol. 46, No. 4. P. 197–221.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Turakulova Lola Xamidjanovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
