The study of the standardization of legal terminology is actually a research of the legal expression system of Chinese civilization, and promotes the professionalism and expressiveness of this ideographic system. Since the law reform in the late Qing Dynasty in 1905, Chinese law has not yet formed a set of precise and professional legal ideographic systems, but it is being formed and is generally formed. Therefore, it has already established the basis for the standardization of legal terminology. In the process of the development of legal system and subject theory, the confusion of legal terminology is an inevitable phenomenon, but we should face up to the problem and carefully analyze its causes in order to solve it.

Legal terms, standardization process, concept

[He Jiahong. On the unification and standardization of legal language: Taking evidence law as the corpus [J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2009(3):73-76.

He Jiahong. Evidence or evidence law [J]. Legal Studies, 2008(1): 129-133.

Wang Tieya. International Law [M]. Beijing: Legal Publishing House, 1995:193-204.

Wang Huoliang. On the applicability of international humanitarian law in non-international armed conflicts [J]. Journal of Hubei Normal University, 2005(1):106-107.

Ding Wen. On the separation of land contracting rights and land contracting and management rights [J]. China Legal Science, 2015(3):170-173.

Cornu G. Linguistique Juridique [M]. 3rd ed. Paris: Montchrestien, 2005: 110-117.

Pound. Interpretation of Legal History [M]. Translated by Deng Zhenglai. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House, 2003: 2.

Hooker. The Communication Dimension of Law [M]. Translated by Sun Guodong. Beijing: Law Press, 2008: 179.

Clarke DC. Methodologies for Research in Chinese Law [J]. University of British Columbia Law Review. 1996 (30): 201-209.

MacAuley M. Social Power and Legal Culture: Litigation Masters in Later Imperial China [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1998: 14.