Evolving Paradigms in Internet Communication: A Linguistic Perspective
Abstract
The evolution of Internet communication has fundamentally reshaped human interaction, fostering the development of unique linguistic phenomena. This study explores the linguistic characteristics of digital discourse, including syntax, morphology, pragmatics, and the emergence of new communication genres. Drawing from extensive literature, we analyze how electronic discourse forms a distinct variety of language, shaped by technological, cultural, and pragmatic forces. Through a comprehensive review, we elucidate the interplay between language innovation and the digital environment, offering insights into the future directions of Internet linguistics.
Keywords
Internet linguistics, digital discourse, multimodal communicationHow to Cite
References
Ever Young Anti-Aging Solutions. (n.d). Retrieved from http://surl.li/gyncav.
AbuSa’aleek, A. (2015). Internet linguistics: A linguistic analysis of electronic discourse as a new variety of language. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n1p135
Baron, N. (2003). Language of the Internet. In The Stanford handbook for language engineers (pp. 59-127). Stanford: CSLI Publications. https://doi.org/10.57912/23845377.v1
Baron, N. (2008). Always on: Language is an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001
Bob’s short English lessons. Meaning of IMHO. (n.d). Retrieved from https://surl.li/dndybq.
Böhmer, A., & Schwab, G. (2024). Digital teaching and learning in higher education: Culture, language, social issues. Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:28429
Bongers, B. (2021). Understanding interaction: The relationships between people, technology, culture, and the environment. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315373386
Chernysh, O. (2022). Modern English-language Internet discourse. Scientific Bulletin of PNPU after K.D. Ushynsky, 34, 118-129.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002
Dosenko, A. (2021). Mobile discourse of communication platforms. State and Regions. Series: Social Communications, 2(46), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2021.2(46)
Frolova, I. (2009). The strategy of confrontation in English-language discourse. Kharkiv: Karazin Kharkiv National University.
Giannoulis, E., & Wilde, L. (2019). Emoticons, “Kaomoji”, and emoji: The transformation of communication in the digital. New York: Routledge.
Halynska, Yu. (2022). International business communications: Lecture notes. Sumy: Sumy State University.
Hudz, N. (2015). Internet discourse as a new type of communication: Structure, language design, genre formats. In Modern linguistic studies: Study guide (pp. 61-87). Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Publishing House.
Izotova, N., Polishchuk, M., & Taranik-Tkachuk, K. (2021). Discourse analysis and digital technologies: (TikTok, hashtags, Instagram, YouTube): Universal and specific aspects in international practice. Amazonia Investiga, 10(44), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.44.08.19
McWhorter, J. (n.d). Txtng is killing language. JK!!!. Retrieved from http://surl.li/qirqbl.
Rupprecht, W. (2014). Introduction to the theory of cognitive communication. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05498-4
Serazhim, K. (2002). Discourse as a socio-linguistic phenomenon: Methodology, architecture, variability. Kyiv: Institute of Journalism.
Stolyarova, M. (2005). Etiquette in virtual English-language communication (based on chatline sessions). (Doctoral dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv).
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Hyejin Kim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
