Ecological Dynamics, Physical Literacy, And Game-Based Learning: An Integrated Theoretical Framework For Movement, Cognition, And Decision-Making Across Educational And Sport Contexts

Authors

  • Isabella Thompson University of Toronto, Canada

Keywords:

Ecological dynamics, physical literacy, motor development

Abstract

The study of human learning, movement, and decision-making has increasingly shifted toward ecological, systems-oriented perspectives that emphasize interaction, adaptation, and context sensitivity. Across domains as diverse as physical education, sport pedagogy, motor development, cognitive psychology, and game-based learning, scholars have challenged reductionist and linear models of skill acquisition in favor of approaches that conceptualize learners as embedded within dynamic environments. Drawing exclusively on the theoretical and empirical foundations provided by the referenced literature, this article develops a comprehensive, integrative framework that unites ecological dynamics, physical literacy, motor coordination theory, and game-based learning into a coherent model of embodied learning. The central argument advanced is that movement competence, cognitive regulation, motivation, and decision-making emerge from reciprocal interactions among individual, task, and environmental constraints, and that these interactions can be deliberately designed through pedagogical and game-based interventions to promote adaptive learning outcomes.

The article synthesizes seminal constraint-based theories of coordination (Newell, 1986), contemporary ecological dynamics research in sport and physical education (Davids and colleagues; Renshaw & Chow, 2019), and the growing physical literacy discourse (Rudd, 2021; O’Sullivan et al., 2020). It further integrates research on executive function, self-regulation, and early academic achievement linked to movement-based tasks (McClelland et al., 2014; Rudd et al., 2019), demonstrating how embodied activity serves as a critical substrate for cognitive development. Complementing this perspective, literature on game-based and problem-based learning (Malone, 1981; Kiili, 2007; Lawson, 2003) is examined to show how well-designed games function as ecological learning environments that afford exploration, intrinsic motivation, and systems thinking.

Methodologically, the article adopts a conceptual synthesis and theory-building approach, drawing descriptive and analytical insights from validated assessment tools such as the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (Oslin et al., 1998), network analysis in team sports (Passos et al., 2011), and landscape-based decision-support gaming models (Jankowski et al., 2006). The results of this synthesis are presented as a detailed explanatory account of how learning emerges across physical, cognitive, and social domains when constraints are strategically manipulated. The discussion critically examines implications for pedagogy, curriculum design, assessment, and future interdisciplinary research, while also addressing theoretical tensions and practical limitations. The article concludes by arguing that ecological dynamics and game-based learning together provide a powerful, unifying paradigm for understanding and enhancing human learning across the lifespan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Maguire, E., & United States Army Corps of Engineers. (1884). Professional notes. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Duncan, R., Bowles, R. P., Acock, A. C., Miao, A., & Pratt, M. E. (2014). Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: The head–toes–knees–shoulders task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 599.

Miller, A., Eather, N., Duncan, M., & Lubans, D. R. (2019). Associations of object control motor skill proficiency, game play competence, physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness among primary school children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(2), 173–179.

Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

Ng, J. L., & Button, C. (2018). Reconsidering the fundamental movement skills construct: Implications for assessment. Movement Sport Sciences, (4), 19–29.

O’Sullivan, M., Davids, K., Woods, C. T., Rothwell, M., & Rudd, J. (2020). Conceptualizing physical literacy within an ecological dynamics framework. Quest, 72(4), 448–462.

Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2), 231–243.

Passos, P., Amaro e Silva, R., Gomez-Jordana, L., & Davids, K. (2020). Developing a two-dimensional landscape model of opportunities for penetrative passing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1–8.

Passos, P., Davids, K., Araújo, D., Paz, N., Minguéns, J., & Mendes, J. (2011). Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(2), 170–176.

Renshaw, I., & Chow, J. Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103–116.

Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Araújo, D., Guilherme, J., Silva, P., & Garganta, J. (2019). Exploiting bi-directional self-organizing tendencies in team sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2213.

Riley, M. A., Richardson, M., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 38.

Rudd, J. (2021). Understanding the ecological roots of physical literacy and how we can build on this to move forward. In Nonlinear pedagogy and the athletics skills model (pp. 20–38). Routledge.

Rudd, J. R., O’Callaghan, L., & Williams, J. (2019). Physical education pedagogies built upon theories of movement learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1630.

Seifert, L., Papet, V., Strafford, B. W., Coughlan, E. K., & Davids, K. (2018). Skill transfer, expertise and talent development. Movement & Sport Sciences, (102), 39–49.

Hopwood, J. L., Flowers, S. K., Seidler, K. J., & Hopwood, E. L. (2013). Race to displace: A game to model the effects of invasive species on plant communities. American Biology Teacher, 75(3), 194–201.

Jankowski, P., Robischon, S., Tuthill, D., Nyerges, T., & Ramsey, K. (2006). Design considerations and evaluation of a collaborative, spatio-temporal decision support system. Transactions in GIS, 10(3), 335–354.

Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 394–404.

Lawson, G. (2003). Ecological landscape planning: A gaming approach in education. Landscape Research, 28(2), 217–223.

Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.

Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 223–253). Erlbaum.

McIntyre, S. (2003). The landscape game: A learning tool demonstrating landscape design principles. Ecological Management & Restoration, 4(2), 103–109.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.

O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455–474.

Pivec, M., & Dziabenko, O. (2004). Game-based learning in universities and lifelong learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(1), 14–26.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Isabella Thompson. (2026). Ecological Dynamics, Physical Literacy, And Game-Based Learning: An Integrated Theoretical Framework For Movement, Cognition, And Decision-Making Across Educational And Sport Contexts. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 7(02), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps/article/view/2361