A Cognitive - Pragmatic Analysis Of Emotional Sentances In English And Uzbek Languages

Authors

  • Muniraxon Kadirova Master’s degree student, Nordic international university, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-07-02-03

Keywords:

Cognitive linguistics, Pragmatics, Emotional sentences

Abstract

This study presents a cognitive-pragmatic analysis of emotional sentences in English and Uzbek languages, focusing on how emotions are conceptualized and pragmatically realized in discourse. Emotional sentences are examined as complex linguistic units that reflect both internal cognitive processes and external communicative intentions. Drawing on cognitive linguistics and pragmatics, the research explores how speakers encode emotional meaning through language and how such meaning is interpreted within specific contexts. The study adopts a qualitative comparative methodology, analyzing emotional sentences collected from contemporary written and spoken sources in both languages. The analysis identifies shared cognitive mechanisms underlying emotional expression, such as the conceptualization of emotions as internal states, while also revealing language-specific pragmatic strategies shaped by cultural norms. The findings demonstrate that English emotional sentences tend to favor explicit emotional expression, whereas Uzbek often relies on implicit and context-dependent forms. The results highlight the importance of integrating cognitive and pragmatic perspectives in the analysis of emotional language. This research contributes to comparative linguistics by providing insights into cross-linguistic similarities and differences in emotional expression and offers practical implications for translation studies, language teaching, and intercultural communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Goddard, C. (2010). Cultural scripts and human communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Muniraxon Kadirova. (2026). A Cognitive - Pragmatic Analysis Of Emotional Sentances In English And Uzbek Languages. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, 7(02), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-07-02-03